September 9, 2009

Practice Problems and Strategies or Why I Don’t Just Give You Answers!

Filed under: Philosophical Musings, Teaching Ideas — natalie @ 12:29 pm

Do you ever have a student come to their lesson and say that they couldn’t practice an assigned piece because they couldn’t figure out what note to start on? Or do they play timidly and explain that they aren’t sure if they are playing with the correct rhythm? Here’s what NOT to do. Don’t point to the beginning of the piece, say, “Oh, that’s an A!” and move the student’s hand to the correct spot on the keyboard. Don’t listen to the first few measures and say, “You’ve almost got it – just make sure you hold the half note for the full two beats.” These sound like decent responses, but they handicap the student’s ability to learn on his own, and increase his sense of dependence on the teacher to solve problems for him.

It will definitely take more time, but I prefer to walk a student through finding the solution for himself. For example, here’s how I handled a student with the rhythm issue described above: “Alright, you’re not sure if you’re playing it correctly and think that the rhythm might be wrong. That’s excellent! Not that you’re playing the rhythm wrong, but that you’re aware that there’s a problem. :-) After all, the first step to fixing problems is knowing that there is one. Now, instead of me just telling you whether it’s right or wrong, let’s imagine that I’m not here and you had to figure it out on your own. What are some ways that you could determine if the rhythm is right or wrong?”

Then I let him give me as many ideas as he could think of. The final step is to have him put some of those ideas to the test and then tell me what he discovers. If he discovers that he was playing the rhythm incorrectly, then we move into a discussion of how to practice effectively to correct the problem. Not only will he likely be successful correcting the problem during the week, but he has also learned a problem-solving strategy that can be used on any future piece of music with a similar issue. Lastly, it provides a common vocabulary of sorts for the future, because if he plays a piece for me and I observe that there is a rhythmic inaccuracy, all I have to say is, “In measure 14, the rhythm is incorrect. Can you determine the error and fix it?” Instead of a glazed-over look, accompanied with a complete lack of understanding as to how to fix the problem, he can go right to work and probably fix it pretty quickly.

For one of my group classes a while back, I wanted to highlight various ways that students can solve problems on their own, so I grouped them in pairs and gave each pair a white board and marker. The I presented each pair with one of the following problems and instructed them to write down as many ways that they could think of to solve the problem. Here’s a list I put together ahead of time to offer suggestions if necessary, but the students did a great job coming up with solutions on their own.

  • Don’t know what note to start on
    • Use landmark notes
    • Look at a piece of music you’ve already learned
    • Compare the starting note to flashcards and find the matching one to see what the note name is
  • Don’t know what sharps or flats are in the scale
    • Use a scale you do know to figure out the pattern
    • Use the circle of 5ths to figure out how many sharps or flats it should have
    • Play a scale you know, then listen to the sound and play the new one so that it sounds the same
  • Don’t know what fingering to use
    • Try alternate fingers and see which one seems to work the most naturally
    • Use scale, chord,  or arpeggio fingerings that fit the pattern
  • Don’t know if the rhythm is correct
    • Write in the counts
    • Tap and count it out loud
    • Use a metronome
    • Find a professional recording and listen to it
  • Don’t know what a term in the music means
    • Look it up in a music dictionary
    • Look it up on the Internet

This is obviously not an exhaustive list, so I’d love to have some additional input! What would you add to the list? How do you help your students learn to identify and find solutions for their problems?

May 12, 2009

Teaching Toward the Future

Filed under: Philosophical Musings — natalie @ 6:35 am

One thing that I’ve realized that I do frequently with my students that keeps my enthusiasm for teaching fresh is visualize them  in the future. I imagine that Landon is no longer a 9-year old boy with hard-to-control fingers, but a mature 19-year old who sits at his family’s piano accompanying hymns while his family sings along. And 7-year old Holly is more than just a precocious little sight-reader flying through her books; in my mind she is a 17-year old graduate, playing a beautiful rendition of Chopin at her graduation.  And so on.

When I view my students in this light, it makes me care more about the sound that they create. It makes me want to put in the extra time and energy to make sure that they can do more than translate notes on a page to sound; I want them to hear the beauty in what they are playing. It makes me willing to work week after week on the same technique until they master it, knowing that it will serve them well whatever their musical future may hold. It makes me excited to see them not only saying the “right” answers, but actually grasping the concepts that I am teaching, for then they can transfer them to all learning.

Every piece along the way contributes to the whole, but it is in stepping back and looking at the whole that I find the energy and motivation to focus relentlessly on the pieces.

May 7, 2009

Do You Hear What I Hear?

Filed under: Philosophical Musings, Teaching Ideas — natalie @ 5:14 am

Have you ever wondered why a student can successfully correct a problem at the lesson when you point it out to them, but then return the following week having reverted to the incorrect way of playing it? I actually started to understand the fundamental issue involved in this phenomenon as a result of taking lessons myself. I would return home from a lesson and begin practicing a piece, only to stare blankly at a particular section knowing that my teacher had addressed something that needed to be corrected, but I couldn’t for the life of me remember what it was! It wasn’t that I didn’t want to fix the problem, or wasn’t willing to put in the time and work to do so; it was that I hadn’t fully grasped what the problem was in the first place.

In order to remedy this teaching disconnect, I think we have to approach it with a fundamental principle in mind:

Music is sound, not what’s printed on the page. When a teacher recognizes that a student is playing something incorrectly, it is because it doesn’t sound right. Either the student is not accurately playing what is represented on the printed music (primarily the technical elements), or the student is playing in a way that is inconsistent with what the teacher wants the piece to sound like (primarily the artistic elements).

Obviously, unless they just doesn’t care, the student is unaware that the sound they are emitting is incongruous with what it should be. So ultimately, as a teacher, what I want to do is help my student hear the errors and be aware of what needs to be fixed so that they can implement an appropriate practice strategy during the week. As I am often wont to tell my students, “Once you hear the mistake, I’m not concerned; I know you can fix it during the week.” But if they have not fully grasped what exactly it was that sounded wrong, the chances of it coming back fixed the following week are pretty slim!

In an effort to apply this understanding and teach my students more effectively, here are three practical approaches that I take:

1. Relate to something the student is already playing correctly. For example, if there are two staccato notes in a row and the student is playing the first one staccato, but is holding the second one (why is this so common?!), instead of pointing to the book and telling the student that both should be played staccato, I ask them to make the sound of the second staccato note match the sound of the first staccato note. Firstly, this places the responsibility on them to listen for and determine whether they are playing it correctly. Secondly, it develops more acute listening skills and forces them to hear the sound of what they are playing. I use the same approach if a student is inadvertently altering the tempo between different sections of the piece. Instead of saying, “You’re playing too slowly at measure 22. You need to play the same tempo,” I say something like, “Play the eighth notes in the left hand at measure 4; now go over to measure 22 and see if you can match the sound and speed of the eighth notes so that they sound the same as measure 4. Does that sound different than how you played it the first time?

2. Play two examples for the student – one as an imitation of how they are playing it, and another as a representation of the way it should be played. I have the student identify which example sounded like the correct one. Usually they get this right. Then I have them try to play a good example. If they do well, I’ll have them give the bad example again, followed once more by the good one so that I can ascertain whether they have truly grasped the problem and how to fix it. If on their second attempt they still play it incorrectly, I play it back to them again and contrast it with a properly played example. The goal is always for them to hear the difference and then be able to relate it to what they are seeing on the page and how they are executing it.

3. Audio or video record the student playing the piece and have them give a critique of it – did they like the way it sounded? do they want to re-record and try to improve it? Sometimes before I play it back, I ask the student to watch/listen for three specific things that they would like to do better if we do a second recording. It’s always insightful to see what they come up with!

Do you all have any other suggestions or ideas of approaches you use to help the students “tune in” to the sound of their playing?

September 11, 2008

Easy Phrases for Students

Filed under: Philosophical Musings, Teaching Ideas — natalie @ 5:55 pm

I love teaching! This is my first week back to teaching after my summer break and I am loving it! I took a little more time off than usual this summer, so I was afraid my students would be pretty rusty. I have been pleasantly surprised. I think I’m rustier than most of them! :-)

There are a couple of phrases that I’ve found myself using with students this week that have been very helpful:

Play this like it’s the easiest thing in the world for you.” – I use this when I observe tension in a student’s hand and they are having trouble making transitions from one place to another on the keyboard (i.e. parallel 5ths). Usually this is a result of them feeling like they can’t leave the keys or they might lose their place or hit a wrong note. So I demonstrate with a really relaxed hand and arm motion, floating off the keys, looking away from the piano, etc. and then landing back down in the new key position. Inevitably they find that it’s not as hard to make the transition as they were making it on themselves.

Drill that section until it feels easy to play.” – Instead of telling them to practice a section a certain number of times, I’ve started using this phrase that requires them to honestly evaluate their playing and progress and puts them in charge of deciding how much practice it needs. They are not focused on counting repetitions, but rather on making progress. So what if they can play it 4 times in a row perfectly? If it still doesn’t feel easy in their hand, they will probably mess it up anyway.

My focus this year is on mastery, so I’m trying not to let my students get away with barely scraping by. I want them to feel comfortable and at-ease when they are playing, not like they are walking on the edge of a cliff and could experience a disastrous slip at any moment. So, for example, if every note of their scale has me on pins and needles wondering if they are going to make it to the end (and please tell me I’m not the only one who hears scales played like this regularly…!), they don’t get to pass it and move on. They have to convince me that they’ve put in the effort and have mastered it in order to progress to the next scale. We’ll see how that plays out this year!

July 3, 2008

Great Pianists on Piano Playing Podcasts

Filed under: Inspirational, Philosophical Musings — natalie @ 7:16 pm

Michael Griffin, developer of the Music Education World website and author of the Music and Keyboard in the Classroom curriculum, has just posted eight episodes of a new Great Pianists on Piano Playing Podcast (scroll to the bottom of the page for the links).

The eight episodes range from 5 to 18 minutes in length and are from a book on conversations with Great Pianists. The book was published in 1917 and is now in the public domain. The episodes include:

Episode 1: Pepito Arriola
Episode 2: Wilhem Bachaus
Episode 3: Harold Bauer
Episode 4: Fanny Bloomfield-Zeisler
Episode 5: Ferrucio Busoni
Episode 6: Leopold Godowsky
Episode 7: Teresa Carreno
Episode 8: Ossip Gabrilowitsch

Thanks to Mr. Griffin for sharing these gems with the rest of us!

May 14, 2008

Quotes from Music and Keyboard in the Classroom Teacher’s Manual

Filed under: Philosophical Musings, Resource Reviews — natalie @ 8:05 am

In the course of reading the Teacher’s Manual for my review of the Music and Keyboard in the Classroom curriculum, these are some quotes that I found particularly helpful and/or thought-provoking:

To further shape a music curriculum it is essential to know what we believe, as educators. Otherwise we will be irresolute in the delivery of our curriculum.” (Pg. 9)

Performing is essential as the primary mode of musical involvement for all students including general music students.” (Pg. 9)

In the arts, production should lie at the centre of any artistic experience: “verbal knowledge (or “talk” about music) is “an ancillary form of knowledge, not to be taken as a substitute for ‘thinking’ and ‘problem solving’ in the medium itself” (Elliott p. 42, Music Matters).” (Pg. 12)

It pays to remember that the primary function of evaluation is not to determine grades but to provide accurate constructive feedback to students.” (Pg. 19)

Music starts as sounds in the head, not signs on paper. But teachers and musicians who have gone through life recreating from notation and devoid of musical creative experiences perpetuate the myth of notational supremacy.” (Pg. 31-32)

We are all born with wonderful imaginations. Indeed, a child’s playtime largely exists in an imaginary world. Kids love to play, to make up stories and sing their own songs. Unfortunately, much of this creative tendency gets lost when children are required to conform to school bureaucracy. It gets sacrificed for more ‘academic’ pursuits like language, maths and science and gets relegated and related to a faculty with the lowest status in the educational system. However, many self-made successful people were not necessarily successful in the school system. This is because they had their own ideas and wanted to try things their way. New inventions and the solving of problems are dependent on creative thinkers. We need to encourage creativity in our
educational systems.
” (Pg. 32)

With ensemble activities, the students actually need one another’s knowledge and skills. Not all school group work demands this.” (Pg. 34)

March 5, 2008

Making A Difference in the World

Filed under: Personal, Philosophical Musings — natalie @ 12:44 am

Following is an article I wrote recently for our local association’s newsletter:

With the touch of a button or the click of a mouse almost anyone anywhere in the world has access to a vast anthology of music. Indeed, we are subjected to the sounds of music whether we are walking through a store, eating at a restaurant or riding in an elevator. Music is everywhere. This begs the question, “Whose music?” Whose music blares from the stereo in the car driving down the street? Whose music gently lulls a little one to sleep at night? Whose music wafts to the rafters in concert halls throughout the world? Whose music vividly recalls the footage it accompanied on our favorite films? The composers and musicians of today are the students of yesteryear. Conversely, the students of today are the composers and musicians of tomorrow.

When ten-year old Ryan walks in for his lesson on Tuesday evenings and eagerly slides onto the bench to play me the latest tune he’s figured out by ear, through what eyes do I see him? The eyes of a teacher who is intent on sticking to a set plan for the lesson? Or the eyes of one who wants to inspire and equip a young boy who has the potential to influence the culture of generations to come? The 18th century Scottish politician Andrew Fletcher once said, “Give me the making of the songs of a nation and I care not who writes its laws.” As one who is actively involved in local and state politics, I find myself nodding in agreement. While politicians may be recognized for a time and certainly make a profound difference in the operation of our society, their influence is primarily external. The melody and words that flow from the song-writer’s pen touch our hearts – for better or for worse. Consider the psalms of David, inspired by God Himself, that have brought hope and comfort to millions of lonely, hurting souls. Or the Hallelujah Chorus, whose notes were penned by the great composer Handel, that hundreds of years later still causes our hearts to swell in unrestrained joy. Or the pop songs of the Beatles that helped define the cultural revolution of the 1960’s.

It is with these thoughts in mind that I approach my teaching this New Year with renewed enthusiasm. I find myself often quoting this Bible verse from Galatians 6:9, “And let us not grow weary of doing good, for in due season we will reap, if we do not give up.” I am reminded that I’m not just teaching a piano lesson; I’m personally investing in the lives of those who will continue to impact the culture after I am gone. One student at a time I’m making a difference in the world.

August 25, 2007

Ring True for Anyone Else?

Filed under: Business Issues, Personal, Philosophical Musings — natalie @ 5:52 pm

Just read this anecdote and couldn’t help but smile…

There was this man who, many years ago, worked for a large business. That was his lifetime employment, but he wasn’t happy there. He wanted to go into business for himself. He saved his money and finally had enough that he could quit and start his own business.

About two years later, I was on vacation and was going through the town where his business was located. I stopped by for a visit. “Hey, John, I heard that the first year is the hardest for a new business.

Yeah, the first year was pretty rough, but we’re doing pretty good now. In fact, I’m getting to where I only have to work half a day.

Wow, that’s pretty nice. Maybe I should think about going into business for myself.

Yeah, and the nicest part of it is that it doesn’t matter which 12 hours you work.

June 14, 2007

Ten Essential Skills for Promoting a Lifelong Love of Music and Music Making

Filed under: Philosophical Musings, Teaching Ideas — natalie @ 11:14 pm

Just came across this list from MTNA that I thought was great! After spending part of the afternoon working on ideas and objectives for my summer piano camps (yes, I confess, I’m just now getting around to planning them), I can see how these will be really helpful in determining what kinds of activities to incorporate. And of course, it provides some great structure to work within for private lessons throughout the year.

Ten Essential Skills for Promoting a Lifelong Love of Music and Music Making

1. Ability to internalize basic rhythms and pulse.

2. Ability to read—musical literacy.

3. Ability to perform with physical ease and technical efficiency.

4. Ability to hear the notes on the page.

5. Ability to work creatively—improvise, compose, harmonize and play by ear.

6. Ability to understand basic elements of theory, form, harmony, etc.

7. Ability to respond to the interpretive elements of the composition in order to express the emotional character of the music.

8. Ability to conceptualize and transfer musical ideas.

9. Ability to work independently and problem solve.

10. Ability to perform comfortably individually and with others in a variety of settings.

December 14, 2006

European and American Music and Christianity

Filed under: On-line Resources, Philosophical Musings — natalie @ 12:29 am

[Natalie's Note: Mike Ellis is at it again - researching and writing on facets of music that often go unexplored by music teachers. In this article, he discusses some interesting correlations and raises some thought-provoking questions. If you haven't checked out his Know Chords website, I highly recommend it. Mike has a way of presenting theory concepts in a way that is concise and easy to understand. His articles are great reading for music students and for teachers looking for good ways to communicate musical concepts and principles to their students. Enjoy his latest article!]

European and American Music and Christianity

By Mike Ellis © 2006

We know, or should know, that the music of Europe and America is not the only music in the world. Many different cultures have their own concepts of music and their own representations of it. We use music based on the diatonic major scale. Other cultures do not. I recently began research into why we use a twelve-note scale. The European music that was eventually brought to America is based on the chromatic scale having twelve tones (the sharp of a note being the same as the flat of the following note):

Scale Image

Going further would cause you to repeat the A note which is already shown. Delving into why we use this method, I discovered the supposed creator of our twelve-note scale. I say supposed only because this could possibly be refuted. However, in my search of the Internet, I found an article on http://www.artsworld.com, by a Mr. Howard Goodall, that reads:

Pythagoras
“Man’s relationship with music is rooted in nature. The ancient Greeks first started arranging notes into scales to create a pattern, and it was the mathematician Pythagoras (c580-500 BC) who created the first real scale. His invention had a profound effect on early western music. He was passing a blacksmith’s forge one day when he noticed the sounds of the metal being hammered and realised that the hammering made different regular notes. When he weighed the hammers, he discovered that they were all ratios of each other. The first was half the size of the next and another was two-thirds the size of the first, and so on. This demonstrated natural harmonics. One note played on, for example, a metal bar can produce many harmonics (higher notes). A bar half the size will produce a note an octave higher. A bar two-thirds the size will produce a note a fifth higher (the dominant note). The ratio of two-thirds is a naturally harmonious relationship in mathematics and it was this that caught Pythagoras’ attention. He was also a mystic who believed that the universe made its own music by the movement of the planets. He felt music would be more powerful and mystical if it obeyed the natural laws of physics, so he set about making a scale of notes by dividing metal into simple ratios, thus creating a spiral of notes. However, when he came to the thirteenth note of the scale, he realised that it was slightly different to the first one and when the two were played together, the result sounded awful. This problem was later to be called ‘the Pythagorean comma’. The notes were not equally apart all the way up the spiral. Pythagoras’ solution was simply to abandon the thirteenth note and he was left with a twelve-note scale. To play safe, musicians kept to the first seven notes of the scale and along with the original note they had an octave. The average instrument could only cope with six notes anyway, and even up until the late thirteenth century music was kept as simple as possible.

Church music, however, required more sophistication, so composers introduced other lines to create more interesting sounds.”

Note that in the text, above, it mentions “natural harmonics,” a “naturally harmonious relationship in mathematics,” and the “natural laws of physics.” The twelve-note system seems to be inspired by nature. Also, it mentions the “first seven notes of the scale.” If you look at the list of notes above the quote, you will see that there are seven “natural” notes, being A, B, C, D, E, F, and G. We’ll come back to this later. Keep the number seven in mind.

What does all this have to do with Christianity? Pythagoras lived a half-century before Christ. This is true. But this is just the beginning. If we go to the calendar, we see twelve months. This is due to Julius Caesar’s calendar devised in 45 BC, chosen after consultation with the astronomer Sosigenes of Alexandria and was probably designed to approximate the tropical year. Again, the number twelve appears in the scheme of natural occurrences. Pope Gregory XIII, a church figure, later modified this calendar in 1582. The European calendar has twelve months in it, as decreed by the Roman Catholic Church, even though the original twelve-month calendar was devised before Christ. Keep the number twelve in mind also.

The most common group of notes in European music is the major triad. This triad is the three notes containing the Root, 3rd and 5th notes of the diatonic (or seven note) scale. This is also the most pleasing and naturally harmonious grouping of notes in European music. It can be said that all other chords are either variations of the major chord, additions to the major chord, or additions to its variations (see http://www.knowchords.com – password access required). In this context, the major chord is the source chord of all other chords, the basis of all chordal harmony. The importance cannot be understated.

And so, what does all this have to do with Christianity? Let’s examine some “coincidental” facts.

The European calendar has twelve months, the European clock has twelve hours, the tribes of Israel numbered twelve, there were twelve disciples of Christ, and there are twelve notes in our scale.

There are seven days in our week, there were seven days of creation, the seven candlesticks are mentioned numerous times in the Bible, and there are seven natural notes in our diatonic major scale.

Christianity embodies the Doctrine of the Holy Trinity, Christ rose on the third day, and our most important source grouping of notes is the major triad.

These may all be coincidental, but they may also not be. It is at least interesting food for thought, especially if you are a Christian, but even if you are not.

One other note should really be presented here. That is that there are only twelve notes, and only seven (not eight) notes of the major scale. No matter how many ways you want to arrange and rearrange these, and no matter how complex scholars want to make the study of music, the “created” complexities you will find in researching European-based music is staggering when compared to the simple twelve notes. It really doesn’t have to be that way. Just ask the medieval minstrels and troubadours, who sang simple stories, much like the Beatles’ songs. By the way, the Beatles were the most successful musical artists of the twentieth century.

[Natalie's Note: After I read Mike's article, I immediately thought of the following passage in the Bible:


For by [Jesus Christ] were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether
they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.

Colossians 1:16-17

Music certainly qualifies as a creation invisible to the eye, albeit profoundly felt by the soul. I find all the correlations Mike presents to be indicative of the great care and order taken by the Creator of the universe when He set about to make music a part of His incredible design. While we cannot hope to fully comprehend all of its complexities, we experience the beauty of His musical design in our everyday lives.]

 

Natalie Wickham


Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Add to Google

-->

Click here to join the Sheet Music Plus Easy Rebates for Music Teachers and receive an 8% rebate on sheet music you or your students purchase!

Classical Sheet Music Downloads
Sheet Music for Piano, Violin, Flute, etc.